Poy v. Allan

209 N.W. 588, 235 Mich. 515, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 779
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Poy v. Allan. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 Mich. 472
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1925·No. Docket No. 17.·Published

Opinion

A motion for rehearing was made in this cause and it was urged earnestly. The case was examined again very carefully by the Justices, and the motion was denied (231 Mich. 472). The substance of the motion was urged again on a petition for reconsideration. It was urged variously and with such zeal that the court as a matter of grace and out of an abundance of caution granted a rehearing. The case has been briefed again and argued at length. Upon full consideration we find no reason to depart from our former opinion.

Decree affirmed, with costs to defendants. *Page 516

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poy v. Allan, 209 N.W. 588, 235 Mich. 515, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 779 (Mich. 1925).

209 N.W. 588 (Poy v. Allan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poy v. Allan
204 N.W. 82 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1925)