Powell v. State

693 So. 2d 625, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2750, 1997 WL 134313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 649 So. 2d 888
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1997·No. No. 95-03829·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Powell appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft in violation of section 812.014, Florida Statutes (1993). We affirm Powell’s conviction without discussion, but strike court costs of $250 imposed as part of his sentence because the trial court failed to orally pronounce or cite supportive statutory authority for the costs. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Brown v. State, 506 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 515 So.2d 229 (Fla.1987).

On remand, the state may seek to have the costs reimposed with reference to the appropriate statutory authority. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 693 So. 2d 625, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2750, 1997 WL 134313 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 625 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Brown v. State
506 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)