Powell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Powell v. State

668 So. 2d 695, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1751, 1996 WL 82746

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1248

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 So. 2d 695 (Powell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powell v. State, 668 So. 2d 695, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1751, 1996 WL 82746 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Powell appeals from criminal convictions entered after a nolo contendere plea and argues that the trial court erred in accepting his plea without first inquiring into the defense of intoxication. Our review of the record indicates that no motion to withdraw the nolo contendere plea was ever made. We therefore dismiss the appeal without prejudice to appellant seeking to withdraw his plea or filing a motion for post-conviction relief.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Powell appeals from criminal convictions entered after a nolo contendere plea and argues that the trial court erred in accepting his plea without first inquiring into the defense of intoxication. Our review of the record indicates that no motion to withdraw the nolo contendere plea was ever made. We therefore dismiss the appeal without prejudice to appellant seeking to withdraw his plea or filing a motion for post-conviction relief.

GLICKSTEIN, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

668 So. 2d 695, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1751, 1996 WL 82746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powell-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack