Powell v. State

682 So. 2d 1244, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12302, 1996 WL 673349
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1996·No. No. 96-1230·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Jamal Powell appeals the trial court’s refusal to suppress the cocaine found in his pocket after he was ordered to exit the vehicle during a road-side stop. We affirm.

Powell was a passenger in a vehicle stopped because the license tag did not match the vehicle on which it was placed. When the driver indicated that the vehicle was owned by Powell, because Powell was loud and fidgeting around inside the vehicle, the officer asked him to exit the vehicle before asking him any additional questions. As the officer was attempting to conduct a security pat-down, Powell’s pocket in his baggy shorts gaped open revealing a clear plastic bag containing several smaller bags containing a white substance which the officer, because of his experience and training, believed to be, and ultimately proved to be, cocaine.

We agree with the trial court that the concern of the officer for the safety of himself and the passenger warranted the order for Powell to exit the vehicle. See Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 98 S.Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977). The cocaine, visible in Powell’s gaping pocket, was thus subject to seizure.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell v. State, 682 So. 2d 1244, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12302, 1996 WL 673349 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

682 So. 2d 1244 (Powell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrews v. State
962 So. 2d 971 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)