Postal Telegraph Co. v. Criscoe
This text of 64 So. 933 (Postal Telegraph Co. v. Criscoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
delivered the opinion of the court.
Had the telegrams from Marley and Jennings been delivered to appellee, no contracts would have been thereby completed. Consequently the case falls within the rule announced in Johnson v. Telegraph Co., 79 Miss. 58, 29 So. 787, 89 Am. St. Rep. 584, and applied in Telegraph Co. v. Adams Machine Co., 92 Miss. 849, 47 So. 412, Telegraph Co. v. Patty Dry Goods Co., 96 Miss. 781, 51 So. 913, and Telegraph Co. v. Crook & Company, 63 So. 350. The court, therefore, erred in refusing defendant’s instructions numbers 4 and 5.
Reversad and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
64 So. 933, 107 Miss. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-co-v-criscoe-miss-1914.