Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

79 Miss. 58
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 79 Miss. 58 (Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 79 Miss. 58 (Mich. 1901).

Opinion

Terral, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

E. M. Quigley & Co., of St. Louis, on July 27, 1898, sent to appellant the following telegram: “ E. A. Johnson, More-head, Miss.: We have million yards, pay both ways; work [61]*61Georgiana, Ala. Do you want any ? Hancock will be Georgi-ana after Thursday. Speak quick. R. M. Quigley & Co.” The declaration for damages by Johnson alleges that he wanted work, had worked before with Quigley & Co., and would, if he had received the telegram, have gone to Georgiana, where Quigley & Co. had a large contract for the construction of a railroad,’and that he would have entered into a contract for the doing of a part of said work, and would have made a large sum of money upon said contract.

We think the damages here sued for are too remote to be recovered. If the telegram had been received, it only gave appellant an opportunity for making a contract for railroad work, which he might have made or might not have made; and, if he had made a contract for work, what he should have made thereon would have been subject to several contingencies. In other words, the damages here claimed are not the direct result of the breach of duty complained of. They do not naturally, or necessarily or probably, arise from the wrong done; and, because the damages claimed are remote and uncertain, the appellant may not recover. Railroad Co. v. Ragsdale, 46 Miss., 458; 1 Suth. on Damages, sec. 15; Telegraph Co. v. Hall, 124 U. S., 444 (s.c. 8 Sup. Ct., 577; 31 L. Ed., 479).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowling v. Western Union Tel. Co.
92 F.2d 864 (First Circuit, 1937)
Davenport v. Western Union Tel. Co.
9 P.2d 172 (Montana Supreme Court, 1932)
Munson S. S. Line v. Horace Turner & Co.
81 So. 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
McQuilkin v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
151 P. 21 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Postal Telegraph Co. v. Criscoe
64 So. 933 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook
63 So. 350 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Adams Machine Co.
47 So. 412 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1908)
Mills v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
51 S.E. 290 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Miss. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-western-union-telegraph-co-miss-1901.