Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook

63 So. 350, 106 Miss. 175
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since the only actual damage claimed by appellees is the difference between the price offered for the cotton by Latham and that at which they were compelled to sell it, the court below erred in not granting the instruction requested by appellant, charging the jury that appellees [182] were “not entitled to recover any actual damages.” Johnson v. Telegraph Co., 79 Miss. 58, 29 So. 787, 89 Am. St. Rep. 584; Telegraph Co. v. Adams Machine Co., 92 Miss. 849, 47 So. 412; Telegraph Co. v. Patty Dry Goods Co., 96 Miss. 781, 51 So. 913.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook, 63 So. 350, 106 Miss. 175 (Mich. 1913).

63 So. 350 (Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Postal Telegraph Co. v. Criscoe
64 So. 933 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)