Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook

63 So. 350, 106 Miss. 175
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 So. 350 (Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Postal Telegraph & Cable Co. v. Crook, 63 So. 350, 106 Miss. 175 (Mich. 1913).

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Since the only actual damage claimed by appellees is the difference between the price offered for the cotton by Latham and that at which they were compelled to sell it, the court below erred in not granting the instruction requested by appellant, charging the jury that appellees [182]*182were “not entitled to recover any actual damages.” Johnson v. Telegraph Co., 79 Miss. 58, 29 So. 787, 89 Am. St. Rep. 584; Telegraph Co. v. Adams Machine Co., 92 Miss. 849, 47 So. 412; Telegraph Co. v. Patty Dry Goods Co., 96 Miss. 781, 51 So. 913.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Postal Telegraph Co. v. Criscoe
64 So. 933 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 350, 106 Miss. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/postal-telegraph-cable-co-v-crook-miss-1913.