Porter v. State

917 So. 2d 1010, 2006 WL 12941
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 940 So. 2d 579
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 2006·No. 4D04-3595·Published

Opinion

917 So.2d 1010 (2006)

Aaron PORTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D04-3595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 4, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique E. L'Italien, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1011 PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant's conviction for direct criminal contempt of court because, although we do not agree with appellant that the evidence did not support the conviction, the court failed to make the mandatory findings of fact required by rule 3.830, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure (2004). Guardado v. Guardado, 813 So.2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Reversed.

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. State, 917 So. 2d 1010, 2006 WL 12941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

917 So. 2d 1010 (Porter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guardado v. Guardado
813 So. 2d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)