Porter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Porter v. State

846 So. 2d 608, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7483, 2003 WL 21173633

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-1564

StatusPublished

This text of 846 So. 2d 608 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. State, 846 So. 2d 608, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7483, 2003 WL 21173633 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Mr. Porter’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Porter argues for the first time that his sentences violate the plea agreement. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Porter may have to raise this claim in the trial court.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Mr. Porter’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Porter argues for the first time that his sentences violate the plea agreement. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Porter may have to raise this claim in the trial court.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 So. 2d 608, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7483, 2003 WL 21173633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.