Porter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Porter v. State

846 So. 2d 608, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7483, 2003 WL 21173633

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 765 So. 2d 76 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2003·No. No. 2D02-1564·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Mr. Porter’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Porter argues for the first time that his sentences violate the plea agreement. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Porter may have to raise this claim in the trial court.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FULMER, Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Mr. Porter’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. On appeal, Mr. Porter argues for the first time that his sentences violate the plea agreement. This affirmance is without prejudice to any right Mr. Porter may have to raise this claim in the trial court.

Affirmed.

DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Porter v. State, 846 So. 2d 608, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7483, 2003 WL 21173633 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

846 So. 2d 608 (Porter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.