Porter v. State

917 So. 2d 1010, 2006 WL 12941
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 2006
Docket4D04-3595
StatusPublished

This text of 917 So. 2d 1010 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. State, 917 So. 2d 1010, 2006 WL 12941 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

917 So.2d 1010 (2006)

Aaron PORTER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D04-3595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 4, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Monique E. L'Italien, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*1011 PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant's conviction for direct criminal contempt of court because, although we do not agree with appellant that the evidence did not support the conviction, the court failed to make the mandatory findings of fact required by rule 3.830, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure (2004). Guardado v. Guardado, 813 So.2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Reversed.

POLEN, KLEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guardado v. Guardado
813 So. 2d 236 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 So. 2d 1010, 2006 WL 12941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.