Porter v. State

611 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1993
DocketNos. 91-3254, 91-3255
StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 628 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. State, 611 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

This cause is per curiam affirmed except for the confusion as to the number of days credit which should be awarded to the defendant. The trial judge orally concluded that credit for three hundred twenty-six (326) days would be awarded. Yet, the written orders set forth a total of three hundred fifty-nine (359) days.

Neither the public defender’s brief, nor the attorney general’s answer brief, provide any illumination to explain the difference. This cause is remanded to the trial judge for a determination of this issue.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.

HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.