Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wynn v. State

Wynn v. State

674 So. 2d 850, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5181, 1996 WL 262207
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 20, 1996
DocketNo. 95-3451
StatusPublished

This text of 674 So. 2d 850 (Wynn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wynn v. State, 674 So. 2d 850, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5181, 1996 WL 262207 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinions

LAWRENCE, Judge.

Larry Wynn appeals an order of the trial court denying his rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and lack of jurisdiction by the trial court to try him for first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder. We affirm.

The supreme court tells us:

A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, to be considered meritorious, must include two general components. First, a claimant must identify particular acts or omissions of the lawyer that are shown to be outside the broad range of reasonably competent performance under prevailing professional standards. Second, the clear, substantial deficiency shown must further be demonstrated to have so affected the fairness and the reliability of the proceeding that confidence in the outcome is undermined. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d [674] (1984); Downs v. State, 453 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1984).

Kennedy v. State, 547 So.2d 912, 913-14 (Fla.1989).

We conclude that the allegations of Wynn’s motion are facially insufficient and therefore fail to meet these minimum standards.

Wynn’s allegation that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the case against him is totally without merit and requires no discussion.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the trial court.

MICKLE, J., concurs. WEBSTER, J., concurs in part and dissents in part, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Overton v. State
531 So. 2d 1382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Downs v. State
453 So. 2d 1102 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Porter v. State
626 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Brown v. State
596 So. 2d 1026 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Wright v. State
646 So. 2d 811 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Kennedy v. State
547 So. 2d 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
LaTulip v. State
645 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Mims v. State
656 So. 2d 577 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
674 So. 2d 850, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5181, 1996 WL 262207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.