Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Porter v. State

Porter v. State

611 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 582 So. 2d 41 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1993·No. Nos. 91-3254, 91-3255·Published

Opinion

LETTS, Judge.

This cause is per curiam affirmed except for the confusion as to the number of days credit which should be awarded to the defendant. The trial judge orally concluded that credit for three hundred twenty-six (326) days would be awarded. Yet, the written orders set forth a total of three hundred fifty-nine (359) days.

Neither the public defender’s brief, nor the attorney general’s answer brief, provide any illumination to explain the difference. This cause is remanded to the trial judge for a determination of this issue.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.

HERSEY and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. State, 611 So. 2d 628, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

611 So. 2d 628 (Porter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.