Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1144
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 F. Supp. 2d 1328
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 13, 2000·No. Consolidated Court No. 98-04-00906·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Restani, Judge:

The court hereby affirms the second remand results of the Department of Commerce. The remand results carry out the court’s direction in Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 00-77 (CIT, July 6, 2000). The court ordered Commerce to eliminate certain known double counting of imputed interest expense in the U.S. indirect selling expense calculation for cold-rolled and corrosion resistant steel products. This was done. The court acknowledges that all double counting may not have been eliminated, particularly because of the effects of non-subject merchandise data. The risk of this, however, lies with respondent, as it did not submit all information necessary to resolve these issues definitively. The facts available methodology employed adequately balances the goals of accuracy and compulsion of response to governmental inquiries in this area.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States, 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1144 (cit 2000).

24 Ct. Int'l Trade 1144 (Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.