Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

118 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 24 C.I.T. 1144, 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2248, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 133
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 13, 2000·No. Slip Op. 00-132; Court No. 98-04-00906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

RESTANI, Judge.

The court hereby affirms the second remand results of the Department of Commerce. The remand results carry out the court’s direction in Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 00-77, 2000 WL 963357 (CIT, July 6, 2000). The court ordered Commerce to eliminate certain known double counting of imputed interest expense in the U.S. indirect selling expense calculation for cold-rolled and corrosion resistant steel products. This was done. The court acknowledges that [1329] all double counting may not have been eliminated, particularly because of the effects of non-subject merchandise data. The risk of this, however, lies with respondent, as it did not submit all information necessary to resolve these issues definitively. The facts available methodology employed adequately balances the goafs of accuracy and compulsion of response to governmental inquiries in this area.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States, 118 F. Supp. 2d 1328, 24 C.I.T. 1144, 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2248, 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 133 (cit 2000).

118 F. Supp. 2d 1328 (Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geum Poong Corp. v. United States
193 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (Court of International Trade, 2002)