Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States

2000 CIT 132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 F. Supp. 2d 1328
United States Court of International Trade·Decided October 13, 2000·No. Consol. 98-04-00906·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. OO- 132

JUIKIMEDFP

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

JANE A. RESTANI, JUDGE

POHANG IRON AND STEEL CO., LTD., POHANG COATED STEEL CO., LTD., AND POHANG STEEL INDUSTRIES CO., LTD.,

Plaintiffs, v. Conso1. Court No. THE UNITED STATES, : 98-04-0O906 and

NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION; U.S. STEEL GROUP - A UNIT OF USX CORPORATION; INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.; BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION; AND LTV STEEL CO., INC.,

Defendant-Intervenors.

The court hereby affirms the second remand results of the Department of Commerce. The remand results carry out the court’s direction in Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip op. 00-77 (CIT, July 6, 2000). The court ordered Commerce to eliminate certain known double counting of imputed interest expense in the U.S. indirect selling expense calculation for cold-rolled and corrosion resistant steel products. This was done. The court acknowledges that all double counting may not

have been eliminated, particularly because of the effects of non-

subject merchandise data. The risk of this, however, lies with respondent, as it did not submit all information necessary to resolve these issues definitively. The facts available methodology employed adequately balances the goals of accuracy and compulsion of response to governmental inquiries in this

S.I`Ea .

Jane A. Restani JUDGE

Dated: New York, New York

/ This!} day of October, 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States, 2000 CIT 132 (cit 2000).

2000 CIT 132 (Pohang Iron & Steel Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.