Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.
This text of 73 S.E. 367 (Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There was no abuse of discretion in denying the interlocutory injunction prayed for in this case.
2. A motion to award damages on the ground that the ease was brought to this court for delay, only must be denied, the judgment to which exception was taken being the refusal of an interlocutory injunction and not a money judgment. Civil Code (1910), § 6213; Brantley v. Buck, 62 Ga. 172; Collins Park & Belt R. Co. v. Short Electric Ry. Co., 95 Ga. 570 (20 S. E. 495).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburg-bartow-mining-manufacturing-co-v-washington-trust-co-ga-1911.