Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.

73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 14, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 367 (Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co., 73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367 (Ga. 1911).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. There was no abuse of discretion in denying the interlocutory injunction prayed for in this case.

2. A motion to award damages on the ground that the ease was brought to this court for delay, only must be denied, the judgment to which exception was taken being the refusal of an interlocutory injunction and not a money judgment. Civil Code (1910), § 6213; Brantley v. Buck, 62 Ga. 172; Collins Park & Belt R. Co. v. Short Electric Ry. Co., 95 Ga. 570 (20 S. E. 495).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Jackson
172 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Berryman v. Royston Bank
88 S.E. 682 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Furr v. Bank of Fairmount
78 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pittsburg-bartow-mining-manufacturing-co-v-washington-trust-co-ga-1911.