Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.
73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367
Opinion
1. There was no abuse of discretion in denying the interlocutory injunction prayed for in this case.
2. A motion to award damages on the ground that the ease was brought to this court for delay, only must be denied, the judgment to which exception was taken being the refusal of an interlocutory injunction and not a money judgment. Civil Code (1910), § 6213; Brantley v. Buck, 62 Ga. 172; Collins Park & Belt R. Co. v. Short Electric Ry. Co., 95 Ga. 570 (20 S. E. 495).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co., 73 S.E. 367, 137 Ga. 232, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 367 (Ga. 1911).
73 S.E. 367 (Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jackson v. Jackson
172 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Berryman v. Royston Bank
88 S.E. 682 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Furr v. Bank of Fairmount
78 S.E. 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)