Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.

95 Ga. 570
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1894·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J. — Unless a “ judgment for a sum certain” has been rendered in the trial court, the Supreme Court has no authority, under section 4286 of the code, to award damages in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, although in the opinion of the court the cause was taken up for delay only. In such case, the plaintiff in error will be allowed to withdraw the writ of error over the objection of opposing counsel. Brantley v. Buck et al., 62 Ga. 172; Ransom & Co. v. Coleman, 45 Ga. 316; Bailie v. ICinchley et al., 52 Ga. 487; Dozier et al. v. Williams, 57 Ga. 600.

Leave to withdraw granted.

By two Justices.

Application to withdraw writ of error.

The exceptions were, to an order directing the receiver of the property of a railroad company to sell the same, under certain provisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co., 95 Ga. 570 (Ga. 1894).

95 Ga. 570 (Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Slaton
160 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Jackson v. Jackson
172 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Street v. Fudge
34 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)