Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.

95 Ga. 570
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 95 Ga. 570 (Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co., 95 Ga. 570 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

Lumpkin, J. — Unless a “ judgment for a sum certain” has been rendered in the trial court, the Supreme Court has no authority, under section 4286 of the code, to award damages in favor of the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, although in the opinion of the court the cause was taken up for delay only. In such case, the plaintiff in error will be allowed to withdraw the writ of error over the objection of opposing counsel. Brantley v. Buck et al., 62 Ga. 172; Ransom & Co. v. Coleman, 45 Ga. 316; Bailie v. ICinchley et al., 52 Ga. 487; Dozier et al. v. Williams, 57 Ga. 600.

Leave to withdraw granted.

By two Justices.

Application to withdraw writ of error.

The exceptions were, to an order directing the receiver of the property of a railroad company to sell the same, under certain provisions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. Slaton
160 S.E.2d 414 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Jackson v. Jackson
172 S.E. 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Street v. Fudge
34 S.E. 845 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 Ga. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-park-belt-railroad-v-short-electric-railway-co-ga-1894.