Brantley v. Buck
62 Ga. 172
Opinion
A judgment in a claim case, declaring the property subject and directing that the fi. fa. proceed, is not a judgment for any sum certain so as to enable the supreme court to award damages against the claimant, under §4286 of the Code, for bringing up the case for delay. The claimant desiring to withdraw his writ of error, may have leave to do so, over the objection of opposing counsel. 45 (?«., 316.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brantley v. Buck, 62 Ga. 172 (Ga. 1878).
62 Ga. 172 (Brantley v. Buck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berryman v. Royston Bank
88 S.E. 682 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Pittsburg-Bartow Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Washington Trust Co.
73 S.E. 367 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Collins Park & Belt Railroad v. Short Electric Railway Co.
95 Ga. 570 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)