Pinnacle Bank v. the Retreat Partners, LLC
This text of Pinnacle Bank v. the Retreat Partners, LLC (Pinnacle Bank v. the Retreat Partners, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ September 29, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15I0018. PINNACLE BANK v. THE RETREAT PARTNERS, LLC, et al.
On August 12, 2014, the trial court entered an order denying Pinnacle Bank’s motion for summary judgment. On August 19, the court certified its order for immediate review. Pinnacle Bank, however, did not file this application for interlocutory appeal until September 2, 2014. We lack jurisdiction because the application is untimely. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), an interlocutory application must be filed with this Court within ten days of the date a timely certificate of immediate review is entered below. Genter v. State, 218 Ga. App. 311 (460 SE2d 879) (1995). Here, Pinnacle Bank filed its application 14 days after entry of the certificate of immediate review. Accordingly, it is untimely and is therefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/29/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pinnacle Bank v. the Retreat Partners, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pinnacle-bank-v-the-retreat-partners-llc-gactapp-2014.