Genter v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Genter v. State

460 S.E.2d 879, 218 Ga. App. 311, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2648, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 702

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 2, 1995

DocketA95A1649

StatusPublished

Cited by49 cases

This text of 460 S.E.2d 879 (Genter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Genter v. State, 460 S.E.2d 879, 218 Ga. App. 311, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2648, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant filed this direct appeal after the denial of his motion to suppress. Held:

“Although the defendant obtained a certificate of review from the trial judge, he failed to make an application to this Court for interlocutory review within 10 days after the grant of the certificate. Since an order denying a motion to suppress is not a final judgment (Cody v. State, 116 Ga. App. 331 (157 SE2d 496) (1967)), this [direct] appeal is premature and thus is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Williams v. State, 148 Ga. App. 176 (251 SE2d 130) (1978).” Holton v. State, 173 Ga. App. 249 (326 SE2d 240). Accordingly, this direct appeal is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant filed this direct appeal after the denial of his motion to suppress. Held:

“Although the defendant obtained a certificate of review from the trial judge, he failed to make an application to this Court for interlocutory review within 10 days after the grant of the certificate. Since an order denying a motion to suppress is not a final judgment (Cody v. State, 116 Ga. App. 331 (157 SE2d 496) (1967)), this [direct] appeal is premature and thus is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Williams v. State, 148 Ga. App. 176 (251 SE2d 130) (1978).” Holton v. State, 173 Ga. App. 249 (326 SE2d 240). Accordingly, this direct appeal is hereby dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews and Blackburn, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

460 S.E.2d 879, 218 Ga. App. 311, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 2648, 1995 Ga. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/genter-v-state-gactapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack