Cody v. State
This text of 157 S.E.2d 496 (Cody v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these cases a notice of appeal was filed appealing from an order of the trial judge refusing to grant a motion for suppression of evidence obtained by an alleged illegal search and seizure. The only judgments from which an appeal may be taken are those enumerated - and set forth in Sec. 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; Code Ann. § 6-701). An order denying a motion to suppress evidence is not a final judgment within Paragraph 1 of that section, nor is it a judgment which would have been final “if it had been rendered as claimed for by the appellant” under Paragraph 2, nor is it among the types of judgments and orders listed in Paragraph 3 of that section. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeals must be sustained.
Appeals dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E.2d 496, 116 Ga. App. 331, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-state-gactapp-1967.