Pike v. Sutton
This text of 42 S.E. 58 (Pike v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A clerk in a retail store, whose duties are such as to keep him employed one half of his time in “ drudgery and hard work,” one fourth of his time “ in waiting on customers in the sale of goods, and one fourth waiting for customer,” is a laborer within the meaning of the laws of this State exempting from garnishment the wages of laborers. Oliver v. Macon. Hardware Co., 98 Ga. 249; Stuart v. Poole, 112 Ga. 818.
2. The court below was right in sustaining the certiorari, but, instead of rendering a final judgment, should have ordered a new trial in the magistrate’s court. See Holmes v. Pye, 107 Ga. 784 ; Alabama R. Co. v. Austin, 112 Ga. 61.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E. 58, 115 Ga. 688, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pike-v-sutton-ga-1902.