Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Austin

37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 61, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 27
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 29, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 91 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Austin, 37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 61, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 27 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Where the final determination of a case tried in a justice’s court, and carried by certiorari to the superior court, does not necessarily depend upon a controlling question of law, and there are issues of fact involved, the superior court has no authority to render a final judgment therein, although it may clearly appear from the facts disclosed by the record that the verdict rendered in the lower court was without evidence to support it. Civil Code, § 4652; Rogers v. Georgia Railroad Co., 100 Ga. 699; Almand v. Georgia Railroad Co., 102 Ga. 151; Pinkston v. White, Id. 561; Johnson & Co. v. Coleman & Burch, 106 Ga. 203.

2. Complaint in a bill of exceptions that a judge of the superior court, in remanding a case to a magistrate, erred “ in not directing the lower court as to how they should render judgment on the hearing of the case there,” plaintiff in error insisting “that instructions should have been given at least with reference to the future finding in said case,” presents no question for determination here, when the bill of exceptions fails to disclose that any particular instruction was asked and refused, or even what instruction was desired.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Putnam v. Sewell
71 S.E.2d 566 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Murphy v. Drum & Bugle Corps
190 S.E. 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Bass Dry Goods Co. v. Electric Storage Battery Co.
51 S.E. 579 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Williams v. Bradfield
43 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Christian
42 S.E. 66 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Pike v. Sutton
42 S.E. 58 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 61, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alabama-great-southern-railroad-v-austin-ga-1900.