PII Sam, LLC v. Mazzurco

106 A.D.3d 973, 965 N.Y.S.2d 365

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Vincent Mazzurco appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), dated [974] October 25, 2011, which denied his motion to set aside the foreclosure sale of the subject property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion to set aside the foreclosure sale without conducting a hearing because the appellant failed to establish that the sale violated RPAPL 231 (4) such that a substantial right of a party was prejudiced (see Johnson v 1476-A Fulton St. Corp., 84 AD3d 1316 [2011]; Matrix Fin. Servs. Corp. v McKiernan, 13 AD3d 344, 344 [2004]; cf. Meade v JD Venture Capital, LLC, 38 AD3d 858, 859 [2007]). Eng, PJ., Rivera, Angiolillo and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PII Sam, LLC v. Mazzurco, 106 A.D.3d 973, 965 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

106 A.D.3d 973 (PII Sam, LLC v. Mazzurco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan
13 A.D.3d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Meade v. JD Venture Capital, LLC
38 A.D.3d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Johnson v. 1476-A Fulton Street Corp.
84 A.D.3d 1316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)