Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan

13 A.D.3d 344, 786 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14884

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 2004·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[345] In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Peter G. McKiernan appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered January 6, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate the foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the foreclosure sale. The appellant failed to establish that “a substantial right of a party was prejudiced” by the trivial irregularities in the notice of sale (RPAPL 231 [6]; see Citibank v Glen Cove Servicing Corp., 265 AD2d 520 [1999]; Marine Midland Bank v Trennes, 250 AD2d 653 [1998]; Amresco New England II v Denino, 283 AD2d 599 [2001]).

The appellant’s remaining contention does not warrant reversal. Smith, J.P, Luciano, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[345] In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the defendant Peter G. McKiernan appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered January 6, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate the foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the foreclosure sale. The appellant failed to establish that “a substantial right of a party was prejudiced” by the trivial irregularities in the notice of sale (RPAPL 231 [6]; see Citibank v Glen Cove Servicing Corp., 265 AD2d 520 [1999]; Marine Midland Bank v Trennes, 250 AD2d 653 [1998]; Amresco New England II v Denino, 283 AD2d 599 [2001]).

The appellant’s remaining contention does not warrant reversal. Smith, J.P, Luciano, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan, 13 A.D.3d 344, 786 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

13 A.D.3d 344 (Matrix Financial Services Corp. v. McKiernan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related