Johnson v. 1476-A Fulton Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. 1476-A Fulton Street Corp.

84 A.D.3d 1316, 923 N.Y.S.2d 898

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 84 A.D.3d 1316 (Johnson v. 1476-A Fulton Street Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. 1476-A Fulton Street Corp., 84 A.D.3d 1316, 923 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated April 20, 2010, which denied their motion to set aside a foreclosure sale on the ground that their attorney was not served with notice of the sale pursuant to CPLR 2103.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances here, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion to set aside the subject foreclosure sale (see Alaska Seaboard Partners Ltd. Partnership v Grant, 20 AD3d 436, 437 [2005]; Olympia Mtge. Corp. v Ramirez, 9 AD3d 401 [2004]; Grohman v Weiss, 242 AD2d 259 [1997]; Polish Natl. Alliance of Brooklyn v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400, 403 [1983]). Dillon, J.E, Belen, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated April 20, 2010, which denied their motion to set aside a foreclosure sale on the ground that their attorney was not served with notice of the sale pursuant to CPLR 2103.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances here, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion to set aside the subject foreclosure sale (see Alaska Seaboard Partners Ltd. Partnership v Grant, 20 AD3d 436, 437 [2005]; Olympia Mtge. Corp. v Ramirez, 9 AD3d 401 [2004]; Grohman v Weiss, 242 AD2d 259 [1997]; Polish Natl. Alliance of Brooklyn v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400, 403 [1983]). Dillon, J.E, Belen, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 A.D.3d 1316, 923 N.Y.S.2d 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-1476-a-fulton-street-corp-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack