Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Pierce v. State

Pierce v. State

146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 124, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 214
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pierce v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Ga. App. 498 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1929·No. 19330·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The overruling of the demurrer to the accusation was not error. Brooks v. State, 39 Ga. App. 32.

2. The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. State, 146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 124, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

146 S.E. 520 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
146 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)