Pierce v. State

146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 124, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 214
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1929
Docket19330
StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 520 (Pierce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. State, 146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 124, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The overruling of the demurrer to the accusation was not error. Brooks v. State, 39 Ga. App. 32.

2. The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
146 S.E. 36 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 520, 39 Ga. App. 124, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-state-gactapp-1929.