Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Pierce v. State

Pierce v. State

137 S.E. 857, 36 Ga. App. 598, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 172
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1927·No. 17812·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence was insufficient to authorize the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. George G. Glenn, D. W. Mitchell, for plaintiffs in error

cited: Bishop v. State, 9 Ga. App. 205; Williams v. State, 159 Ga. 729 et seq.

C. C. Pittman, solicitor-general,

cited: Chance v. State, 33 Ga. App. 137; Williams v. State, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. State, 137 S.E. 857, 36 Ga. App. 598, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 857 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
126 S.E. 844 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Bishop v. State
70 S.E. 976 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Chance v. State
125 S.E. 730 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)