Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Pierce v. State

Pierce v. State

137 S.E. 857, 36 Ga. App. 598, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 172
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1927
Docket17812
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 857 (Pierce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. State, 137 S.E. 857, 36 Ga. App. 598, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence was insufficient to authorize the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was error.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. George G. Glenn, D. W. Mitchell, for plaintiffs in error

cited: Bishop v. State, 9 Ga. App. 205; Williams v. State, 159 Ga. 729 et seq.

C. C. Pittman, solicitor-general,

cited: Chance v. State, 33 Ga. App. 137; Williams v. State, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
126 S.E. 844 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Bishop v. State
70 S.E. 976 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Chance v. State
125 S.E. 730 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 857, 36 Ga. App. 598, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-state-gactapp-1927.