Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/PIEHL v. City of Philadelphia

PIEHL v. City of Philadelphia

944 A.2d 751
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in PIEHL v. City of Philadelphia. Read the opinion of the Court — 604 Pa. 658 →
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2008·No. 468 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether a complaint which names the Commonwealth as a defendant in the caption may be amended to substitute a Commonwealth agency as a party after the statute of limitations has run?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PIEHL v. City of Philadelphia, 944 A.2d 751 (Pa. 2008).

944 A.2d 751 (PIEHL v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.