Piehl v. City of Philadelphia
944 A.2d 751, 596 Pa. 460, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 209
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 12, 2008·No. Appeal No. 468 EAL 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
[461]*461Whether a complaint which names the Commonwealth as a defendant in the caption may be amended to substitute a Commonwealth agency as a party after the statute of limitations has run?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Piehl v. City of Philadelphia, 944 A.2d 751, 596 Pa. 460, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 209 (Pa. 2008).
944 A.2d 751 (Piehl v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ballroom, LLC v. Commonwealth
984 A.2d 582 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)