Piehl v. City of Philadelphia
944 A.2d 751, 596 Pa. 460, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 12, 2008
DocketAppeal No. 468 EAL 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 944 A.2d 751 (Piehl v. City of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Piehl v. City of Philadelphia, 944 A.2d 751, 596 Pa. 460, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 209 (Pa. 2008).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
[461]*461Whether a complaint which names the Commonwealth as a defendant in the caption may be amended to substitute a Commonwealth agency as a party after the statute of limitations has run?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ballroom, LLC v. Commonwealth
984 A.2d 582 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
944 A.2d 751, 596 Pa. 460, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piehl-v-city-of-philadelphia-pa-2008.