Pickett v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 7, 2020·No. 7:17-cv-08379·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEXTER PICKETT, Petitioner, 17 CIVIL 8379 (KMK) 11 CR. 630 (KMK) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED): That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 7, 2020, the Petition is dismissed. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a Certificate of Appealability shall not be issued, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253( c )(2); Lucidore v. N. Y. State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 111-12 (2d Cir. 2000), and the Court further certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this judgment on the merits would not be taken in good faith, see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962) ("We consider a defendant's good faith... demonstrated when he seeks appellate review of any issue not frivolous."); Burda Media Inc. v. Blumenberg, 731 F. Supp. 2d 321, 322-23 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (citing Coppedge and finding that an appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith). Judgment is entered in favor of Respondent; accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York October 7, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K Marge Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickett v. United States, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Pickett v. United States (Pickett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Thomas Lucidore v. New York State Division of Parole
209 F.3d 107 (Second Circuit, 2000)
BURDA MEDIA INC. v. Blumenberg
731 F. Supp. 2d 321 (S.D. New York, 2010)