Picano v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.
This text of 68 A.D.3d 425 (Picano v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Given no dispute that no one was holding the ladder from which plaintiff fell when it suddenly shifted or wobbled, and that no safety devices were provided to prevent the ladder from slipping or plaintiff from falling if it did, it does not avail defendants to assert that the ladder itself was not defective (see Hernandez v Bethel United Methodist Church of N.Y., 49 AD3d 251, 252-253 [2008]; Rieger v 303 E. 37 Owners Corp., 49 AD3d 347 [2008]), or that plaintiff himself was negligent in attempting to descend the ladder with both hands full of materials and tools (see Aponte v City of New York, 55 AD3d 485 [2008]). We have considered defendants’ other arguments and find them to be unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Andrias, Nardelli and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 425, 889 N.Y.2d 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picano-v-rockefeller-center-north-inc-nyappdiv-2009.