Aponte v. City of New York

55 A.D.3d 485, 868 N.Y.S.2d 169
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 A.D.3d 485 (Aponte v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aponte v. City of New York, 55 A.D.3d 485, 868 N.Y.S.2d 169 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered May 7, 2007, which granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his cause of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) as against defendants City of New York and City of New York Department of Design and Construction, and denied such motion as against defendant O’Brien Kreitsberg, Inc. (OBK), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants’ failure to provide adequate safety devices and to properly secure the ladder was a contributing cause of the accident. Plaintiff’s conduct, at most, constituted comparative negligence, which is not a defense under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Montalvo v J. Petrocelli Constr., Inc., 8 AD3d 173 [2004]; Orellano v 29 E. 37th St. Realty Corp., 292 AD2d 289 [2002]).

Regarding the court’s denial of plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as against OBK, the “construction manager” for the project, plaintiff did not cross-appeal from this ruling (see CPLR 5515). In any event, given the existence of factual issues concerning the scope of the construction manager’s oversight and control of the work, the motion court’s ruling was appropriate (see e.g. Walls v Turner Constr. Co., 4 NY3d 861, 863-864 [2005]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining contentions, including that the motion was premature in light of the need for further discovery, and find them unavailing. Plaintiff’s request to strike material from the record on appeal is denied. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Williams, Buckley and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Romanczuk v. Metropolitan Insurance & Annuity Co.
72 A.D.3d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Picano v. Rockefeller Center North, Inc.
68 A.D.3d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Voultepsis v. Gumley-Haft-Klierer, Inc.
60 A.D.3d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 485, 868 N.Y.S.2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aponte-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2008.