PHYMATRIX MANAGEMENT CO. v. Bakarania

737 So. 2d 588, 1999 WL 424411
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 1999
Docket97-4543
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 So. 2d 588 (PHYMATRIX MANAGEMENT CO. v. Bakarania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PHYMATRIX MANAGEMENT CO. v. Bakarania, 737 So. 2d 588, 1999 WL 424411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

737 So.2d 588 (1999)

PHYMATRIX MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC., and Edward E. Goldman, Medpartners, Inc., and James Segal, M.D., Appellants,
v.
Magan L. BAKARANIA, M.D., George Brick, M.D., Jeram Kankotia, M.D., Agustin A. Martin, M.D., Daksha R. Patel, M.D., Luis Napolean Pinzon, M.D., Antonia Rivera, M.D., Stephen Voltarel, M.D., Alan J. Iezzi, M.D., David Lubin, M.D., Walwin D. Metzger, M.D., Oscar Perez, M.D., John D. Ramirez, M.D., Edward D. Scanlan, M.D., and Department of Health, Board of Medicine, Appellees.

No. 97-4543.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 1999.
Rehearing Denied July 27, 1999.

Michael J. Cherniga and Seann M. Frazier of Greenberg Traurig, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.

Alan S. Gassman of Gassman & Conette, P.A., Clearwater, and Darryl R. Richards and Jonathan S. Coleman of Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A., Tampa, for Appellees Magan L. Bakarania, M.D., et al.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Allen R. Grossman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee Board of Medicine.

Jonathan Sjostrom, Gary Scott Davis, and Donna E. Blanton of Steel, Hector and Davis, LLP, Tallahassee, for Amicus Curiae PhyCor, Inc.

Donald H. Partington of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond, Stackhouse & Stone, Pensacola, for Amicus Curiae West Florida Medical Center Clinic.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a declaratory statement by an administrative agency. Because the appellant has not shown that the agency's interpretation of the law is clearly erroneous, we must affirm. See Regal Kitchens, Inc. v. Florida Department of Revenue, 641 So.2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Affirmed.

MINER, DAVIS and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Novick v. Department of Health
816 So. 2d 1237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 So. 2d 588, 1999 WL 424411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phymatrix-management-co-v-bakarania-fladistctapp-1999.