Phillips v. Elliott

25 P.2d 557, 17 P.2d 1119, 144 Or. 694, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 55
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 20, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 25 P.2d 557 (Phillips v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phillips v. Elliott, 25 P.2d 557, 17 P.2d 1119, 144 Or. 694, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 55 (Or. 1933).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, respondents herein, move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not served and filed within 60 days after the rendition of the judgment appealed from as provided by section 7-503, Oregon Code 1930. The judgment was entered on July 25, 1932, and the notice of appeal was filed with service indorsed thereon on September 24, 1932.

Section 7-109, Oregon Code 1930, provides that the time in which an act is to be done, as provided in the code, shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last, unless the last day falls upon Sunday, Christmas, or other non-judicial day, in which ease the last day shall also be excluded.

It is contended by plaintiffs that by excluding the day on which the judgment was rendered and including the day on which the notice of appeal was filed a period of 61 days had elapsed and, hence, the notice of appeal was filed one day too late. Whatever may be our present view as to the meaning of section 7-109, the question is settled adversely to plaintiffs’ contention by U. S. National Bank v. Shefler, 77 Or. 579 (143 P. 51); Be Andersen’s Estate, 101 Or. 94 (188 P. 164); Re Application of Riggs, 105 Or. 531 (207 P. 175); Steeves v. Steeves, 139 Or. 261 (9 P. (2d) 815).

Motion overruled.

*696 E. L. Elliott, of Klamath Falls (H, C. Merryman, of Klamath Falls, on the brief), for appellant. William Qanong, of Klamath Falls, for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. Beem Corporation
437 P.2d 483 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1968)
Beardsley v. Hill
348 P.2d 58 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
Meyer v. Meyer
276 P.2d 386 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1954)
Hughes, Trustee v. Honeyman
208 P.2d 355 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1949)
Stretch v. Murphy
112 P.2d 1018 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1941)
Osborne v. Zimmerman
105 P.2d 1097 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1940)
Luverne Holding Co. v. Mead
34 P.2d 346 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1934)
Phillips v. Elliott
25 P.2d 557 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 P.2d 557, 17 P.2d 1119, 144 Or. 694, 1933 Ore. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phillips-v-elliott-or-1933.