Phillips v. Allen

255 So. 2d 528, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3195
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 8, 1971·No. No. 41580·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, an indigent, plead no contest to, and was convicted of, six violations of municipal ordinances in the Municipal Court of Orlando, Florida. Each conviction resulted in alternative sentences requiring petitioner to either pay a fine or serve time in jail.1 Being indigent, petitioner went to the Municipal Prison Farm.

He then petitioned for a writ of ha-beas corpus on the contention that he was forced to choose jail solely on account of his indigency, in violation of Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395, 91 S.Ct. 668, 28 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1971) and Martin v. State, 248 So.2d 643 (Fla.1971). This Court granted the writ and dispensed with the return. We then relinquished jurisdiction temporarily to the Municipal Court of Orlando so that it could consider the nature of the fines imposed in light of Tate and Martin. In consequence, the Municipal Court modified its sentence: it vacated all money fines imposed, and reduced the total period of confinement from 240 to 90 days.

With this modification of petitioner’s sentences, any issue regarding the fines evaporates and no further question exists regarding a possible violation of Tate v. Short, supra, Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. [529]*529235, 90 S.Ct. 2018, 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970) or Morris v. Schoonfield, 399 U.S. 508, 90 S.Ct. 2232, 26 L.Ed.2d 773 (1970).

The writ heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, Acting C. J., dissents with opinion.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phillips v. Allen, 255 So. 2d 528, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3195 (Fla. 1971).

255 So. 2d 528 (Phillips v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related