PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY

N.D. Florida

PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY

DecidedOctober 17, 2019

Docket3:19-cv-03755

StatusUnknown

This text of PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY (PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY, (N.D. Fla. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2885

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —39)

On April 3, 2019, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 366 F.Supp.3d 1368 (J.P.M.L. 2019). Since that time, 988 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Florida. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Florida and assigned to Judge Rodgers. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of April 3, 2019, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. ed. Baw Oct 17, 2019 John W. Nichols Coen ores Clerk of the Panel JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2885

SCHEDULE CTO−39 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN MSN 1 19−00176 Pevey v. 3M Company et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2885

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —39)

On April 3, 2019, the Panel transferred 8 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 366 F.Supp.3d 1368 (J.P.M.L. 2019). Since that time, 988 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Florida. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Florida and assigned to Judge Rodgers. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Florida for the reasons stated in the order of April 3, 2019, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable M. Casey Rodgers. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. ed. Baw Oct 17, 2019 John W. Nichols Coen ores Clerk of the Panel JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2885

SCHEDULE CTO−39 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN MSN 1 19−00176 Pevey v. 3M Company et al

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pevey-v-3m-company-flnd-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack