In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig.
366 F. Supp. 3d 1368
CourtUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
DecidedApril 3, 2019
DocketMDL No. 2885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 366 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig., 366 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (jpml 2019).
Opinion
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2885 - IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Central District of California
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:19-00128
District of Minnesota
CIACCIO v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00179
PEEK v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00192
LARKIN v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00194
PULLIUM v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00603
Western District of Oklahoma
STINE v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:19-00058
WERNER v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:19-00059
Western District of Texas
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 6:19-00019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
CUPIT v. 3M COMPANY
N.D. Florida, 2022
PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY
N.D. Florida, 2019
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
366 F. Supp. 3d 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-3m-combat-arms-earplug-prods-liab-litig-jpml-2019.