In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig.
366 F. Supp. 3d 1368
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation·Decided April 3, 2019·No. MDL No. 2885·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
SCHEDULE A
MDL No. 2885 - IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Central District of California
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 5:19-00128
District of Minnesota
CIACCIO v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00179
PEEK v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00192
LARKIN v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00194
PULLIUM v. 3M COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 0:19-00603
Western District of Oklahoma
STINE v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:19-00058
WERNER v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 5:19-00059
Western District of Texas
ROWE v. 3M COMPANY, C.A. No. 6:19-00019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig., 366 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (jpml 2019).
366 F. Supp. 3d 1368 (In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Prods. Liab. Litig.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CUPIT v. 3M COMPANY
N.D. Florida, 2022
PEVEY v. 3M COMPANY
N.D. Florida, 2019