Peterson v. Peterson
153 N.W.2d 831, 278 Minn. 433, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 890
Opinion
Relator was convicted of constructive criminal contempt by the District Court of Hennepin County on March 18, 1965. The proceedings were prosecuted: by plaintiff-respondent’s private attorney rather thari by the county attorney, and relator was not afforded a jury trial. The judgment accordingly must be reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with Peterson v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peterson v. Peterson, 153 N.W.2d 831, 278 Minn. 433, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 890 (Mich. 1967).
153 N.W.2d 831 (Peterson v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Discipline of Drexler
188 N.W.2d 436 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)
Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye v. Peterson, Robert W. Dygert and James P. Rorris
400 F.2d 336 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)