Peterson v. Peterson
153 N.W.2d 830, 278 Minn. 432, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889
Opinion
Relptor was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin Coupty OP March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson [433]*433v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825, his convictioh Must be reversed and a new trial granted.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peterson v. Peterson, 153 N.W.2d 830, 278 Minn. 432, 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889 (Mich. 1967).
153 N.W.2d 830 (Peterson v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Discipline of Drexler
188 N.W.2d 436 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)
Petterson v. Bartels
170 N.W.2d 572 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
Palmer A. Peterson v. Faye v. Peterson, Robert W. Dygert and James P. Rorris
400 F.2d 336 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)