Peters v. State

651 So. 2d 1316, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3210, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 783
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peters v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 626 So. 2d 1048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 1995·No. No. 94-1114·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress, citing for support Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 99 S.Ct. 2586, 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), and United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). These cases were overruled four years ago by California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 111 S.Ct. 1982, 114 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991). Florida is bound by this decision. See Fla. Const, art. I, § 12. Acevedo also effectively overrules Manee v. State, 457 So.2d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 464 So.2d 556 (Fla.1985). The order of the trial court is affirmed.

DELL, C.J., and WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. State, 651 So. 2d 1316, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3210, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 783 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 1316 (Peters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Chadwick
433 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Arkansas v. Sanders
442 U.S. 753 (Supreme Court, 1979)
California v. Acevedo
500 U.S. 565 (Supreme Court, 1991)
Manee v. State
457 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)