Peters v. State

598 So. 2d 199, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 1992 WL 91397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Peters v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 626 So. 2d 1048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1992·No. No. 91-2348·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, John Peters, appeals from a judgment of conviction for attempted manslaughter. Upon the state’s proper confession that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that excusable and justifiable homicide are elements of manslaughter, we reverse and remand for a new trial. See Rojas v. State, 552 So.2d 914 (Fla.1989); Kinnamon v. State, 593 So.2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Miller v. State, 561 So.2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 574 So.2d 143 (Fla.1990).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peters v. State, 598 So. 2d 199, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5130, 1992 WL 91397 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 199 (Peters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rojas v. State
552 So. 2d 914 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Miller v. State
561 So. 2d 596 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Kinnamon v. State
593 So. 2d 334 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)