Peters v. State
This text of 651 So. 2d 1316 (Peters v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress, citing for support Arkansas v. Sanders, 442 U.S. 753, 99 S.Ct. 2586, 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), and United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). These cases were overruled four years ago by California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565, 111 S.Ct. 1982, 114 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991). Florida is bound by this decision. See Fla. Const, art. I, § 12. Acevedo also effectively overrules Manee v. State, 457 So.2d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), rev. denied, 464 So.2d 556 (Fla.1985). The order of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 So. 2d 1316, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3210, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peters-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.