Peterhoff v. State
890 So. 2d 1130, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18095, 2004 WL 2723578
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2004·No. No. 1D03-2086·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of James Peterhoffs motion to correct illegal sentence brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Pelegrina v. State, 763 So.2d 1231, 1231 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Rosa v. State, 742 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peterhoff v. State, 890 So. 2d 1130, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18095, 2004 WL 2723578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
890 So. 2d 1130 (Peterhoff v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blankenship v. Department of Transp.
890 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)