Peterhoff v. State
890 So. 2d 1130, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18095, 2004 WL 2723578
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-2086
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 890 So. 2d 1130 (Peterhoff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peterhoff v. State, 890 So. 2d 1130, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18095, 2004 WL 2723578 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of James Peterhoffs motion to correct illegal sentence brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Pelegrina v. State, 763 So.2d 1231, 1231 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Rosa v. State, 742 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blankenship v. Department of Transp.
890 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 1130, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18095, 2004 WL 2723578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peterhoff-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.