Rosa v. State

742 So. 2d 462, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355, 1999 WL 771411
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1999
DocketNo. 99-01353
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 742 So. 2d 462 (Rosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rosa v. State, 742 So. 2d 462, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355, 1999 WL 771411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Rosa appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm without prejudice to Rosa’s ability, if any, to raise the same issue in a properly sworn and timely motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and BLUE and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterhoff v. State
890 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 So. 2d 462, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12355, 1999 WL 771411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rosa-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.