Pelegrina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pelegrina v. State

763 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2000 WL 718169

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2000

DocketNo. 1D99-256

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 So. 2d 1231 (Pelegrina v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pelegrina v. State, 763 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2000 WL 718169 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the plea agreement permitted a sentence at the trial court’s discretion, we affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). However, because it appears from the record that the parties (including appellant and his attorney) may have been under the mistaken impression that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, rather than the 1992, were applicable, and that, pursuant to the latter, the maximum permissible sentence would have been significantly shorter than that imposed pursuant to the former, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right timely to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 seeking to withdraw his plea.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because the plea agreement permitted a sentence at the trial court’s discretion, we affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). However, because it appears from the record that the parties (including appellant and his attorney) may have been under the mistaken impression that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, rather than the 1992, were applicable, and that, pursuant to the latter, the maximum permissible sentence would have been significantly shorter than that imposed pursuant to the former, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right timely to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 seeking to withdraw his plea.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6805, 2000 WL 718169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pelegrina-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack