Perry v. State

605 So. 2d 1008, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801, 1992 WL 279929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perry v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 593 So. 2d 1165
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1992·No. No. 92-2826·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review on an order that reserved ruling on his motion for post conviction relief. The trial court acted within its discretion when it reserved ruling pending the supreme court’s disposition in Williams v. State, 593 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, No. 79,507 (Fla. July 6, 1992). Appellant has failed to demonstrate jurisdiction in this court for certiorari review or as provided in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and HERSEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perry v. State, 605 So. 2d 1008, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10801, 1992 WL 279929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1008 (Perry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
593 So. 2d 1064 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)