Perez v. State

697 So. 2d 1319, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9716, 1997 WL 484678
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 689 So. 2d 306
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1997·No. No. 97-03320·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jose Perez appeals the trial court’s summary order of denial with attachments of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because we conclude that the records attached to the trial court’s order do not conclusively refute the appellant’s claim for relief, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. If on remand the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it must attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively refute the appellant’s allegation that the written judgment and sentence does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence.

Reversed and remanded.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LAZZARA and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perez v. State, 697 So. 2d 1319, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9716, 1997 WL 484678 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 1319 (Perez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.